9c068619e1
VIOLET_TODO_CRITICAL.md (prominent review queue): - 🔴 CRITICAL #1: VIOLET↔BLUE parity report (PASS-2 Task 4, violet_parity_20260616_220412.md) is VERY DISAPPOINTING — pick-match 1.5%, no-pick 86%, same-asset 13.6%. KEY NUANCE: on the 43 aligned rows sizing is near-identical (lev_err median 0.0) → the divergence is SELECTION / TIMING / comparison-ALIGNMENT, NOT the sizing math. Root-cause before any soak/V4. (Claude.) - #2: OA PASS-1 + PASS-2 reported done, NOT yet reviewed — review queue listed. - #3: future integration/E2E + the pass-vs-sprint nomenclature note (pass = sub-sprint work-package; V-stage = sprint/epic, matching existing usage). VIOLET_PART_SPEC_OA_TODO_PASS3.md (lengthy, plan-derived, independent units with shared interfaces — nothing invented): contracts_v3 (VenueTick/OpenPositionView/ExitDecision) + VenuePriceFeedPort+BingX adapter, MechanicalExitGuard (armed TP/SL), sub-second SL/ADVSL floor guard, event-sourced restore from trade_reconstruction, venue lead/lag slippage metric, cadence per-action Q schedule + telemetry. Each ships + tests standalone; composition map + order given. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>