880 lines
35 KiB
Markdown
880 lines
35 KiB
Markdown
# Financial Crisis Prediction Toolkit Design (Background Reasearch)
|
||
|
||
**Created:** 8/20/2025 13:30
|
||
**Updated:** 8/21/2025 16:11
|
||
**Exported:** 8/21/2025 16:11
|
||
**Link:** [https://claude.ai/chat/217e1682-1f08-4769-be95-169e7a0fb5ec](https://claude.ai/chat/217e1682-1f08-4769-be95-169e7a0fb5ec)
|
||
|
||
## Prompt:
|
||
20/8/2025, 13:32:08
|
||
|
||
Implement what follows, based on SILOQY/DOLPHIN BINANCE tick data:
|
||
|
||
# COMPLETE CONVERSATION SUMMARY: FINANCIAL CRISIS PREDICTION WITH SILOQY/DOLPHIN INTEGRATION
|
||
|
||
## CONVERSATION OVERVIEW
|
||
|
||
This conversation focused on building a comprehensive financial crisis prediction system, starting with a detailed request to explain multiple crisis prediction techniques "in the simplest way possible" with full implementation code, then diving into "excruciating detail" about inputs, and finally working toward integrating SILOQY/DOLPHIN data (context from a different chat).
|
||
|
||
## INITIAL REQUEST & RESPONSE
|
||
|
||
**User's Original Request:**
|
||
- Explain financial crisis prediction techniques in simplest terms
|
||
- Provide complete implementation code
|
||
- Cover several techniques that can be chained together
|
||
- Identify inputs/outputs in detail
|
||
- Reference was made to extensive literature review including Dynamic Network Biomarkers (DNB), Hyperdimensional forecasting (TSF-HD), Empirical Intrinsic Geometry (EIG), probabilistic multivariate early warning systems, and Topological Data Analysis (TDA)
|
||
|
||
**My Response - Complete Crisis Prediction Toolkit:**
|
||
|
||
I created a comprehensive `FinancialCrisisPredictionToolkit` class implementing 6 major techniques:
|
||
|
||
### 1. DYNAMIC NETWORK BIOMARKERS (DNB)
|
||
**Simple Explanation:** Find groups of variables that become highly connected to each other but disconnect from everything else (like cliques forming at a party before drama happens)
|
||
|
||
**Technical Implementation:**
|
||
- Input: DataFrame with multiple time series (rows=time, cols=variables)
|
||
- Algorithm: Calculate intra-group variance, intra-group correlation, inter-group correlation
|
||
- Formula: `DNB_score = (intra_variance * intra_correlation) / (inter_correlation + 0.001)`
|
||
- Output: DNB score (higher = more crisis-like) + biomarker groups
|
||
- Crisis Signal: High DNB score means variables are clustering unusually
|
||
|
||
### 2. SHANNON ENTROPY GRADIENT
|
||
**Simple Explanation:** Measure how predictable vs random the data becomes over time (like weather becoming either perfectly predictable OR completely random before a storm)
|
||
|
||
**Technical Implementation:**
|
||
- Input: Dictionary {horizon: prediction_errors_array}
|
||
- Algorithm: Discretize residuals into bins, calculate Shannon entropy across horizons
|
||
- Formula: `entropy = -sum(hist * log2(hist))`, then `gradient = d(entropy)/d(horizon)`
|
||
- Output: Entropy gradient + entropy values by horizon
|
||
- Crisis Signal: Sudden changes in predictability patterns across time horizons
|
||
|
||
### 3. PREDICTION HORIZON DISCONTINUITY
|
||
**Simple Explanation:** Detect when prediction ability suddenly breaks down at certain time horizons (like suddenly only being able to see 100 feet instead of 1 mile while driving)
|
||
|
||
**Technical Implementation:**
|
||
- Input: Dictionary {horizon: [accuracy_scores_over_time]}
|
||
- Algorithm: Compare recent vs baseline performance, detect changepoints
|
||
- Output: Discontinuity score + detected changepoints
|
||
- Crisis Signal: Sudden drops in prediction accuracy at specific horizons
|
||
|
||
### 4. CROSS-SCALE COHERENCE
|
||
**Simple Explanation:** Check if short-term (minutes) and long-term (daily) patterns start moving in lockstep (like heartbeat and breathing syncing unusually when stressed)
|
||
|
||
**Technical Implementation:**
|
||
- Input: High-frequency data + low-frequency data
|
||
- Algorithm: Calculate cross-spectral coherence using scipy.signal.coherence
|
||
- Output: Coherence score (0-1) + frequency analysis
|
||
- Crisis Signal: High coherence means loss of normal scale separation
|
||
|
||
### 5. TOPOLOGICAL FEATURES
|
||
**Simple Explanation:** Analyze the geometric "shape" of data patterns in high dimensions (data creates shapes like loops, clusters, holes - changes warn of transitions)
|
||
|
||
**Technical Implementation:**
|
||
- Input: Single univariate time series
|
||
- Algorithm: Time-delay embedding, pairwise distances, cluster persistence across scales
|
||
- Output: Persistence score + embedded data points
|
||
- Crisis Signal: High persistence score means complex/unstable geometric patterns
|
||
|
||
### 6. COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY SCALING
|
||
**Simple Explanation:** Track if you need increasingly complex models for same prediction accuracy (like needing bigger hammer to drive same nail - wood is getting harder)
|
||
|
||
**Technical Implementation:**
|
||
- Input: Model performance history + complexity metrics (time, parameters, cost)
|
||
- Algorithm: Calculate efficiency trends and complexity scaling rates
|
||
- Output: Complexity scaling rate + efficiency trend
|
||
- Crisis Signal: Rapidly increasing computational requirements
|
||
|
||
### FUSION ALGORITHM
|
||
**Combines all indicators into single crisis probability:**
|
||
- Normalize all scores to [0,1] using sigmoid functions
|
||
- Weighted probabilistic averaging
|
||
- Output: Single crisis probability (0-1)
|
||
- Interpretation: >0.7 = High risk, 0.4-0.7 = Moderate risk, <0.4 = Low risk
|
||
|
||
## DETAILED INPUT SPECIFICATIONS REQUEST
|
||
|
||
**User's Second Request:** "Could you in excruciating detail explain *the inputs*?"
|
||
|
||
**My Response - Comprehensive Input Guide:**
|
||
|
||
I created a massive input specification document covering every parameter in exhaustive detail:
|
||
|
||
### DYNAMIC NETWORK BIOMARKERS INPUTS
|
||
|
||
**`data` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: pandas DataFrame
|
||
- Shape: (n_timesteps, n_variables)
|
||
- Rows: Timestamps (DatetimeIndex preferred, min window_size observations)
|
||
- Columns: Financial variables (stocks, ETFs, indicators)
|
||
- Values: Consistent units (don't mix prices $150 with returns 0.02)
|
||
- Quality: <10% missing data, no extreme outliers
|
||
- Examples: ['AAPL', 'MSFT', 'GOOGL'] or ['XLF', 'XLK', 'XLE'] or cross-asset universe
|
||
|
||
**`group_size` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: int, Default: 5, Range: 2 to min(10, n_variables//2)
|
||
- Controls: Number of variables in biomarker clusters
|
||
- Selection: 2-3 for small portfolios, 4-6 for sectors, 5-8 for cross-asset
|
||
|
||
### SHANNON ENTROPY INPUTS
|
||
|
||
**`residuals_dict` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: dict, Structure: {horizon: numpy.array}
|
||
- Keys: Prediction horizons ([1,5,10,20] for daily data)
|
||
- Values: Prediction errors (actual - predicted)
|
||
- Generation methods: Autoregressive, ML models, GARCH, VAR
|
||
|
||
**`n_bins` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: int, Default: 10, Range: 5-50
|
||
- Rule of thumb: sqrt(n_observations) or sample_size/10
|
||
|
||
### PREDICTION HORIZON DISCONTINUITY INPUTS
|
||
|
||
**`performance_dict` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: dict, Structure: {horizon: [accuracy_scores_over_time]}
|
||
- Values: Model performance (accuracy, R², Sharpe, IC)
|
||
- Length: Min 50 observations, recommended 100+
|
||
- Generation: Rolling window evaluation, expanding window evaluation
|
||
|
||
**`baseline_window` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: int, Default: 50, Range: 20-200
|
||
- Selection: 10-20% of total performance history length
|
||
|
||
### CROSS-SCALE COHERENCE INPUTS
|
||
|
||
**`micro_data` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: numpy.array/pandas.Series
|
||
- Frequency: Higher than macro_data (2x-10x+)
|
||
- Alignment: Same time period as macro_data
|
||
- Examples: Minute vs daily, tick vs minute, hourly vs daily
|
||
|
||
**`macro_data` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: numpy.array/pandas.Series
|
||
- Relationship: Same underlying asset at different scales
|
||
- Aggregation: Could be aggregated version of micro_data
|
||
|
||
**`sample_rate` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: float, Default: 1.0
|
||
- Selection: Based on data frequency and analysis needs
|
||
|
||
### TOPOLOGICAL FEATURES INPUTS
|
||
|
||
**`data` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: numpy.array/pandas.Series (univariate)
|
||
- Length: Min 50, recommended 200+
|
||
- Type: Continuous numerical (preferably stationary)
|
||
- Preprocessing: Use returns not prices, remove outliers
|
||
|
||
**`embedding_dim` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: int, Default: 3, Range: 2-10
|
||
- Selection: 3-4 optimal for financial data, data-driven methods available
|
||
|
||
**`delay` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: int, Default: 1, Range: 1-20
|
||
- Selection: Autocorrelation minimum, mutual information minimum
|
||
|
||
### COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY INPUTS
|
||
|
||
**`model_performance_history` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: list of float
|
||
- Content: Time series of accuracy/performance scores
|
||
- Metrics: Accuracy (0-1), R² (0-1), Sharpe (0-3), IC (-1 to 1)
|
||
- Collection: Walk-forward validation, production monitoring
|
||
|
||
**`complexity_history` Parameter:**
|
||
- Type: list of float/int
|
||
- Content: Computational resource requirements
|
||
- Metrics: Training time, parameters, memory, cost
|
||
- Alignment: MUST match performance_history length and timing
|
||
|
||
### DATA QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
|
||
- Consistent frequencies across all inputs
|
||
- Temporal alignment (same time periods)
|
||
- Minimum data lengths (50+ observations)
|
||
- Missing data handling (<10% missing)
|
||
- Outlier removal (3σ threshold)
|
||
- Unit consistency (prices OR returns, not mixed)
|
||
|
||
## SILOQY/DOLPHIN INTEGRATION REQUEST
|
||
|
||
**User's Third Request:** "I'd like to plug SILOQY/DOLPHIN data into this"
|
||
|
||
**Research Findings:**
|
||
- I searched extensively but could not find SILOQY/DOLPHIN as a recognized financial data provider
|
||
- Found various companies with "DOLPHIN" in name (offshore enterprises, entertainment, capital investors)
|
||
- Found SILO Finance (crypto DeFi protocol) but not SILOQY specifically
|
||
- User indicated "SILOQY context is in a different chat"
|
||
|
||
**My Response - Universal Integration System:**
|
||
|
||
I created a comprehensive `SILOQYDolphinDataIntegrator` class that handles any possible data format:
|
||
|
||
### UNIVERSAL FORMAT SUPPORT
|
||
- **CSV/TSV**: Any delimiter (comma, semicolon, tab, pipe)
|
||
- **JSON**: Various structures (arrays, nested objects, records)
|
||
- **Excel**: Multiple sheets with automatic sheet detection
|
||
- **Parquet**: High-performance columnar format
|
||
- **SQL**: SQLite databases with automatic table detection
|
||
- **HDF5**: Scientific data format
|
||
|
||
### INTELLIGENT DATA PROCESSING
|
||
- **Automatic format detection**: Based on file extension and content analysis
|
||
- **Column categorization**: Auto-identifies dates, prices, volumes, returns
|
||
- **Data quality assessment**: Missing data, duplicates, outliers analysis
|
||
- **Smart preprocessing**: Missing data filling, outlier removal, frequency resampling
|
||
|
||
### CRISIS TOOLKIT PREPARATION
|
||
- **Data cleaning pipeline**: Handles missing values, removes outliers (3σ)
|
||
- **Frequency standardization**: Resample to any target frequency (D, H, min)
|
||
- **Price-to-return conversion**: Automatic detection and conversion
|
||
- **Micro/macro pair generation**: Creates multi-scale data for coherence analysis
|
||
- **Performance history simulation**: Generates synthetic model performance data
|
||
|
||
### KEY INTEGRATION METHODS
|
||
|
||
**`load_data()`**: Universal data loading with automatic format detection
|
||
**`analyze_data_structure()`**: Comprehensive data structure analysis
|
||
**`prepare_for_crisis_prediction()`**: Complete preprocessing pipeline
|
||
**`export_for_toolkit()`**: Outputs crisis prediction toolkit-ready inputs
|
||
|
||
### USAGE PATTERNS
|
||
```python
|
||
# Basic integration
|
||
integrator = SILOQYDolphinDataIntegrator('siloqy_data.csv')
|
||
raw_data = integrator.load_data()
|
||
prepared_data, metadata = integrator.prepare_for_crisis_prediction()
|
||
|
||
# Advanced configuration
|
||
config = {
|
||
'date_columns': ['timestamp'],
|
||
'price_columns': ['close_price'],
|
||
'missing_data_threshold': 0.05
|
||
}
|
||
integrator = SILOQYDolphinDataIntegrator(config=config)
|
||
|
||
# Export for toolkit
|
||
toolkit_inputs = integrator.export_for_toolkit()
|
||
results, crisis_probability, details = toolkit.analyze_time_series(**toolkit_inputs)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## CURRENT STATUS & NEXT STEPS
|
||
|
||
### WHAT'S BEEN ACCOMPLISHED
|
||
1. ✅ Complete crisis prediction toolkit with 6 techniques implemented
|
||
2. ✅ Exhaustive input specification documentation
|
||
3. ✅ Universal SILOQY/DOLPHIN data integration system
|
||
4. ✅ Automatic data processing and preparation pipeline
|
||
5. ✅ End-to-end workflow from raw data to crisis predictions
|
||
|
||
### WHAT'S NEEDED FROM USER
|
||
To complete the SILOQY/DOLPHIN integration, I need:
|
||
|
||
1. **Data Format**: What format is SILOQY/DOLPHIN data in? (CSV, JSON, Excel, database)
|
||
|
||
2. **Data Structure**: Column names and types, such as:
|
||
```
|
||
Date, SILOQY_SPY, SILOQY_TLT, SILOQY_VIX, Volume_SPY, etc.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
3. **Frequency**: Data frequency (daily, hourly, minute, tick-level)
|
||
|
||
4. **Sample Data**: A few rows showing the actual structure
|
||
|
||
5. **Special Requirements**: Any SILOQY-specific preprocessing needs
|
||
|
||
### IMMEDIATE NEXT ACTIONS
|
||
1. Get SILOQY/DOLPHIN data specifications from other chat
|
||
2. Customize integration code for specific SILOQY format
|
||
3. Test integration with real SILOQY data
|
||
4. Run complete crisis prediction analysis
|
||
5. Validate results and tune parameters
|
||
|
||
### TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE SUMMARY
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
SILOQY/DOLPHIN Raw Data
|
||
↓
|
||
SILOQYDolphinDataIntegrator
|
||
• Format detection
|
||
• Data loading
|
||
• Structure analysis
|
||
• Quality assessment
|
||
• Preprocessing pipeline
|
||
↓
|
||
Crisis Prediction Toolkit
|
||
• Dynamic Network Biomarkers
|
||
• Shannon Entropy Gradient
|
||
• Prediction Horizon Discontinuity
|
||
• Cross-scale Coherence
|
||
• Topological Features
|
||
• Computational Complexity
|
||
↓
|
||
Fusion Algorithm
|
||
↓
|
||
Crisis Probability (0-1)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### CODE ARTIFACTS CREATED
|
||
1. **`crisis_prediction_toolkit`**: Complete implementation of all 6 techniques
|
||
2. **`input_specification_guide`**: Exhaustive input documentation
|
||
3. **`siloqy_dolphin_integration`**: Universal data integration system
|
||
|
||
The system is ready for immediate use once SILOQY/DOLPHIN data specifications are provided from the other chat context.
|
||
|
||
## KEY RESEARCH REFERENCES MENTIONED
|
||
- Dynamic Network Biomarkers (DNB) theory & reviews
|
||
- TSF-HD (Hyperdimensional time-series forecasting) - arXiv:2402.01999
|
||
- Empirical Intrinsic Geometry (EIG) - PNAS paper
|
||
- Probabilistic multivariate EWS - arXiv:2205.07576
|
||
- Topological Data Analysis in finance - Gidea & Katz (250 trading-day lead)
|
||
- Critical slowing down in finance - Wang et al. 2016/2018
|
||
|
||
All techniques are grounded in peer-reviewed research and have been implemented with proper mathematical foundations and practical considerations for financial markets.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Response:
|
||
20/8/2025, 13:32:25
|
||
|
||
````plaintext
|
||
Thought process: Analyzed SILOQY/DOLPHIN integration for financial crisis prediction system.
|
||
|
||
Let me break down what the user is asking for based on this extensive context:
|
||
|
||
1. They want to implement the financial crisis prediction system that was developed in a previous conversation
|
||
2. They want to integrate it specifically with SILOQY/DOLPHIN Binance tick data
|
||
3. From the project knowledge, I can see:
|
||
- SILOQY is their overall system name
|
||
- DOLPHIN is the regime detection subsystem that produces market sentiment data
|
||
- JERICHO is the state machine/signaling system
|
||
- DOLPHIN outputs JSON files with regime data like: {"regime": "BULL", "up_ratio": 0.7627, "down_ratio": 0.2373, "total_symbols": 405, "timestamp": "2025-08-12T17:10:16.389625"}
|
||
|
||
4. The user wants me to build something that integrates the crisis prediction toolkit with this DOLPHIN regime data from Binance
|
||
|
||
5. They want me to be brief and not output artifacts without authorization
|
||
|
||
6. They want HFT-standard, best-of-breed code that works on Windows/Linux and is amenable to ML approaches
|
||
|
||
Let me first understand what they want me to implement specifically and ask for clarification before jumping into code.
|
||
````
|
||
|
||
Thank you for the comprehensive context. I understand you want to integrate the financial crisis prediction toolkit with your SILOQY/DOLPHIN Binance tick data system.
|
||
|
||
From the project knowledge, I can see:
|
||
|
||
**DOLPHIN Output Format (from sample files):**
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"regime": "BULL"/"BEAR",
|
||
"up_ratio": 0.7627,
|
||
"down_ratio": 0.2373,
|
||
"total_symbols": 405,
|
||
"timestamp": "2025-08-12T17:10:16.389625"
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Key Integration Questions:**
|
||
|
||
1. **Data Integration Point**: Should the crisis prediction system consume:
|
||
- DOLPHIN's regime output files directly?
|
||
- Real-time websocket feeds from DOLPHIN?
|
||
- Raw Binance tick data before DOLPHIN processing?
|
||
|
||
2. **Crisis Prediction Scope**: Apply crisis detection to:
|
||
- DOLPHIN's regime classification patterns over time?
|
||
- The underlying 500-symbol correlation matrices from DOLPHIN?
|
||
- Individual asset data (like BTCUSDT) with Bollinger Band distances?
|
||
|
||
3. **Output Integration**: Should crisis signals feed into:
|
||
- JERICHO's FSM state machine?
|
||
- Separate crisis alert system?
|
||
- Combined regime+crisis probability score?
|
||
|
||
4. **Temporal Alignment**:
|
||
- DOLPHIN runs every 5 seconds with 15m candles
|
||
- Crisis prediction needs sufficient history - how many DOLPHIN cycles to accumulate?
|
||
|
||
**Most Logical Architecture:**
|
||
```
|
||
Binance Tick Data → DOLPHIN (regime detection) → Crisis Prediction Layer → JERICHO (signals) → HARLEQUIN (trading)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Before I implement**, please confirm:
|
||
- Which DOLPHIN output data should feed the crisis prediction?
|
||
- Where in the SILOQY pipeline should crisis detection occur?
|
||
- Should I start with a standalone crisis monitor or integrate into existing components?
|
||
|
||
This will ensure I build exactly what fits your architecture.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Prompt:
|
||
20/8/2025, 13:35:31
|
||
|
||
Unless you have a better idea: Combined regime+crisis probability score. Raw Binance tick data before DOLPHIN processing *and* Dolphin outputs. The underlying 500-symbol correlation matrices from DOLPHIN
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Response:
|
||
20/8/2025, 13:35:55
|
||
|
||
````plaintext
|
||
Thought process: Engineered multi-scale crisis detection framework for financial analysis.
|
||
|
||
The user wants a comprehensive approach that combines:
|
||
|
||
1. **Combined regime+crisis probability score** - This makes sense as it would give a unified signal
|
||
2. **Raw Binance tick data before DOLPHIN processing AND DOLPHIN outputs** - This is smart because:
|
||
- Raw tick data gives granular micro-structure information
|
||
- DOLPHIN outputs give regime-level macro information
|
||
- Combined gives multi-scale crisis detection
|
||
3. **The underlying 500-symbol correlation matrices from DOLPHIN** - This is excellent because correlation breakdown is a key crisis indicator
|
||
|
||
This is actually a very sophisticated approach. Let me think through the architecture:
|
||
|
||
**Multi-Scale Crisis Detection Architecture:**
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Raw Binance Tick Data (Micro-scale)
|
||
↓
|
||
Crisis Features:
|
||
- Trade velocity/momentum (from tick aggregation feature request)
|
||
- Cross-scale coherence (tick vs 15m bars)
|
||
- Topological features (tick patterns)
|
||
↓
|
||
DOLPHIN Processing (500 symbols → regime detection)
|
||
↓
|
||
DOLPHIN Outputs (Macro-scale):
|
||
- regime classification over time
|
||
- up_ratio/down_ratio time series
|
||
- 500x500 correlation matrices
|
||
↓
|
||
Crisis Features:
|
||
- Dynamic Network Biomarkers (correlation matrix analysis)
|
||
- Shannon Entropy (regime classification predictability)
|
||
- Prediction Horizon Discontinuity (regime prediction breakdown)
|
||
↓
|
||
Combined Crisis+Regime Score
|
||
↓
|
||
JERICHO FSM (enhanced with crisis awareness)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
This gives us:
|
||
1. **Micro-scale crisis detection** from raw tick data
|
||
2. **Macro-scale crisis detection** from DOLPHIN regime/correlation analysis
|
||
3. **Combined scoring** that fuses both scales
|
||
4. **Enhanced JERICHO** that considers both normal regime changes and crisis conditions
|
||
|
||
The user is asking for a very sophisticated multi-scale crisis detection system. This is actually a better idea than what I initially proposed because it captures crisis signals at multiple time scales and data granularities.
|
||
|
||
|
||
I'll draft a concise proposal outlining the key architectural components and validation approach. This will help ensure alignment on the technical strategy before diving into implementation details.
|
||
````
|
||
|
||
Excellent approach! Multi-scale crisis detection using both micro (tick) and macro (regime/correlation) data is superior to single-scale analysis. This captures crisis signals across time scales.
|
||
|
||
**Proposed Architecture:**
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ SILOQY CRISIS DETECTION │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ Raw Binance Tick Data │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Micro-Scale Crisis Features: │
|
||
│ • Trade velocity/momentum (from your tick aggregation req) │
|
||
│ • Cross-scale coherence (tick ↔ 15m patterns) │
|
||
│ • Topological features (tick clustering patterns) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ DOLPHIN Processing (500 symbols) │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Macro-Scale Crisis Features: │
|
||
│ • Dynamic Network Biomarkers (500×500 correlation matrix) │
|
||
│ • Shannon Entropy (regime predictability breakdown) │
|
||
│ • Prediction Horizon Discontinuity (regime forecast decay) │
|
||
│ • Correlation complexity scaling │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Combined Regime+Crisis Score: │
|
||
│ • regime_probability: [BULL|BEAR|NEUTRAL] (0-1) │
|
||
│ • crisis_probability: [STABLE|WARNING|CRISIS] (0-1) │
|
||
│ • combined_confidence: Overall signal strength (0-1) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Enhanced JERICHO FSM │
|
||
│ • Normal regime transitions (existing logic) │
|
||
│ • Crisis-aware state modifications │
|
||
│ • Emergency exit conditions │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Key Components:**
|
||
|
||
1. **CrisisDetectionLayer**: Processes both tick and DOLPHIN data
|
||
2. **MultiScaleCrisisAnalyzer**: Fuses micro/macro crisis signals
|
||
3. **RegimeCrisisFusion**: Combines regime+crisis into unified score
|
||
4. **Enhanced JERICHO**: Crisis-aware state machine
|
||
|
||
**Output Format:**
|
||
```python
|
||
{
|
||
"timestamp": "2025-08-20T...",
|
||
"regime_score": {
|
||
"classification": "BULL",
|
||
"probability": 0.85,
|
||
"up_ratio": 0.76
|
||
},
|
||
"crisis_score": {
|
||
"level": "WARNING",
|
||
"probability": 0.35,
|
||
"micro_features": {...},
|
||
"macro_features": {...}
|
||
},
|
||
"combined_signal": {
|
||
"action_recommendation": "HOLD_WITH_CAUTION",
|
||
"confidence": 0.72,
|
||
"explanation": ["Regime BULLISH @85%", "Crisis warning @35% - correlation breakdown detected"]
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Questions before implementing:**
|
||
|
||
1. **DOLPHIN Correlation Matrix Access**: Do you want me to modify DOLPHIN to expose the 500×500 correlation matrices, or capture them via websocket?
|
||
|
||
2. **Crisis Integration Point**: Should this be a separate `CRISIS-DETECTOR` component alongside DOLPHIN, or embedded within DOLPHIN itself?
|
||
|
||
3. **Tick Data Source**: Use your existing Nautilus tick aggregation system, or build separate tick processor?
|
||
|
||
4. **Crisis Thresholds**: Conservative (fewer false alarms) or sensitive (early warnings) for crypto markets?
|
||
|
||
Shall I proceed with this multi-scale architecture?
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Prompt:
|
||
20/8/2025, 15:12:40
|
||
|
||
1. If Crisis component is part of Dolphin, it should share memory struct w/ Dolphin. Even maybe have dolphin output stats to Nautilus bus.
|
||
2. Within Dolphin.
|
||
3 Nautilus ticks. As Dolphin fetches
|
||
|
||
Take care for correct implementation
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Response:
|
||
20/8/2025, 15:13:24
|
||
|
||
````plaintext
|
||
Thought process: Architected Dolphin-Crisis integration with Nautilus tick processing
|
||
|
||
The user wants:
|
||
1. Crisis component embedded within DOLPHIN, sharing memory structures with DOLPHIN
|
||
2. DOLPHIN should output stats to Nautilus message bus
|
||
3. Use Nautilus ticks as DOLPHIN fetches them
|
||
4. Correct implementation
|
||
|
||
From the project knowledge, I can see:
|
||
- DOLPHIN currently fetches 15m candles for 500 symbols from Binance
|
||
- It calculates correlations and regime detection
|
||
- Outputs regime results as JSON files
|
||
- The user wants to integrate with Nautilus for tick data
|
||
- They want multi-scale crisis detection using both tick data and DOLPHIN's correlation matrices
|
||
|
||
The architecture should be:
|
||
1. Enhanced DOLPHIN that:
|
||
- Keeps existing 500-symbol regime detection
|
||
- Adds crisis detection component that shares memory with regime detection
|
||
- Processes Nautilus tick data for micro-scale features
|
||
- Fuses micro + macro crisis signals
|
||
- Outputs enhanced regime+crisis data to Nautilus bus
|
||
|
||
Key implementation considerations:
|
||
- Memory sharing between regime detection and crisis detection within DOLPHIN
|
||
- Nautilus integration for tick data processing
|
||
- Preserving existing DOLPHIN algorithm while adding crisis features
|
||
- Correct data structures and threading
|
||
- Performance optimization for HFT requirements
|
||
|
||
I should provide a clear implementation plan that:
|
||
1. Shows how to embed crisis detection within DOLPHIN
|
||
2. Defines shared memory structures
|
||
3. Shows Nautilus tick integration
|
||
4. Provides the enhanced output format
|
||
5. Maintains DOLPHIN's existing functionality
|
||
````
|
||
|
||
Understood. Embedding crisis detection **within DOLPHIN** with shared memory structures and Nautilus integration. Here's the correct implementation architecture:
|
||
|
||
## Enhanced DOLPHIN with Embedded Crisis Detection
|
||
|
||
**Modified DOLPHIN Structure:**
|
||
```python
|
||
class EnhancedMarketRegimeDetector:
|
||
"""DOLPHIN with embedded multi-scale crisis detection"""
|
||
|
||
def __init__(self, symbols, thresholds):
|
||
# Existing DOLPHIN components
|
||
self.symbols = symbols
|
||
self.thresholds = thresholds
|
||
self.correlation_matrix = None # 500x500 shared memory
|
||
self.price_data = {}
|
||
|
||
# NEW: Shared memory structures for crisis detection
|
||
self.shared_memory = {
|
||
'correlation_matrix': None, # Shared with crisis detector
|
||
'regime_history': deque(maxlen=100),
|
||
'tick_features': {},
|
||
'crisis_metrics': {},
|
||
'combined_state': {}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
# NEW: Embedded crisis detection component
|
||
self.crisis_detector = EmbeddedCrisisDetector(
|
||
shared_memory=self.shared_memory,
|
||
nautilus_bus=None # Set during Nautilus integration
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# NEW: Nautilus integration for tick data
|
||
self.nautilus_tick_processor = None
|
||
|
||
def integrate_nautilus(self, nautilus_bus):
|
||
"""Initialize Nautilus tick processing"""
|
||
self.crisis_detector.nautilus_bus = nautilus_bus
|
||
self.nautilus_tick_processor = NautilusTickProcessor(
|
||
symbols=['BTCUSDT'], # Target asset for tick analysis
|
||
shared_memory=self.shared_memory,
|
||
crisis_detector=self.crisis_detector
|
||
)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Shared Memory Structure:**
|
||
```python
|
||
class SharedMemoryStructure:
|
||
"""Memory-efficient shared data between regime and crisis detection"""
|
||
|
||
def __init__(self):
|
||
# Regime detection data (existing)
|
||
self.correlation_matrix = np.zeros((500, 500), dtype=np.float32)
|
||
self.up_ratios = deque(maxlen=100)
|
||
self.down_ratios = deque(maxlen=100)
|
||
self.regime_timestamps = deque(maxlen=100)
|
||
|
||
# Crisis detection data (new)
|
||
self.crisis_scores = deque(maxlen=100)
|
||
self.network_biomarkers = {}
|
||
self.entropy_metrics = deque(maxlen=50)
|
||
self.coherence_scores = deque(maxlen=50)
|
||
|
||
# Tick-level features (new)
|
||
self.tick_velocity = deque(maxlen=1000) # Trade velocity
|
||
self.tick_momentum = deque(maxlen=1000) # Price momentum
|
||
self.tick_clusters = {} # Topological features
|
||
|
||
# Combined output (new)
|
||
self.combined_signal = {
|
||
'regime_prob': 0.0,
|
||
'crisis_prob': 0.0,
|
||
'confidence': 0.0,
|
||
'explanation': []
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Embedded Crisis Detector:**
|
||
```python
|
||
class EmbeddedCrisisDetector:
|
||
"""Crisis detection embedded within DOLPHIN, sharing memory"""
|
||
|
||
def __init__(self, shared_memory, nautilus_bus=None):
|
||
self.shared_memory = shared_memory
|
||
self.nautilus_bus = nautilus_bus
|
||
|
||
# Crisis detection components
|
||
self.network_biomarker = DynamicNetworkBiomarker()
|
||
self.entropy_analyzer = ShannonEntropyGradient()
|
||
self.coherence_analyzer = CrossScaleCoherence()
|
||
self.topology_analyzer = TopologicalFeatures()
|
||
|
||
def update_from_regime_detection(self, regime_result):
|
||
"""Called after each DOLPHIN regime detection cycle"""
|
||
|
||
# Update shared memory with regime data
|
||
self.shared_memory.up_ratios.append(regime_result['up_ratio'])
|
||
self.shared_memory.down_ratios.append(regime_result['down_ratio'])
|
||
self.shared_memory.regime_timestamps.append(regime_result['timestamp'])
|
||
|
||
# Update correlation matrix reference (shared memory)
|
||
if hasattr(regime_result, 'correlation_matrix'):
|
||
self.shared_memory.correlation_matrix = regime_result['correlation_matrix']
|
||
|
||
# Perform macro-scale crisis analysis
|
||
macro_crisis_score = self._analyze_macro_crisis()
|
||
|
||
# Combine with micro-scale features (from tick processor)
|
||
micro_crisis_score = self._get_micro_crisis_score()
|
||
|
||
# Fuse regime + crisis signals
|
||
combined_signal = self._fuse_regime_crisis(regime_result, macro_crisis_score, micro_crisis_score)
|
||
|
||
# Update shared memory
|
||
self.shared_memory.combined_signal = combined_signal
|
||
|
||
# Send to Nautilus bus
|
||
if self.nautilus_bus:
|
||
self._send_to_nautilus_bus(combined_signal)
|
||
|
||
return combined_signal
|
||
|
||
def _analyze_macro_crisis(self):
|
||
"""Macro-scale crisis analysis using 500-symbol correlation matrix"""
|
||
|
||
# Dynamic Network Biomarkers on correlation matrix
|
||
if len(self.shared_memory.up_ratios) >= 50:
|
||
biomarker_score = self.network_biomarker.analyze(
|
||
correlation_matrix=self.shared_memory.correlation_matrix,
|
||
regime_history=list(self.shared_memory.up_ratios)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Shannon Entropy on regime predictability
|
||
if len(self.shared_memory.up_ratios) >= 30:
|
||
entropy_score = self.entropy_analyzer.analyze(
|
||
regime_sequence=list(self.shared_memory.up_ratios)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
# Combine macro features
|
||
macro_score = (biomarker_score + entropy_score) / 2
|
||
return macro_score
|
||
|
||
def _get_micro_crisis_score(self):
|
||
"""Get micro-scale crisis score from tick processor"""
|
||
if hasattr(self.shared_memory, 'tick_features'):
|
||
return self.shared_memory.tick_features.get('crisis_score', 0.0)
|
||
return 0.0
|
||
|
||
def _fuse_regime_crisis(self, regime_result, macro_crisis, micro_crisis):
|
||
"""Fuse regime detection with crisis probability"""
|
||
|
||
# Regime probability (existing DOLPHIN logic)
|
||
regime_prob = self._calculate_regime_probability(regime_result)
|
||
|
||
# Crisis probability (weighted combination)
|
||
crisis_prob = 0.7 * macro_crisis + 0.3 * micro_crisis
|
||
|
||
# Combined confidence
|
||
confidence = min(regime_prob, 1.0 - crisis_prob) # High confidence when regime clear AND no crisis
|
||
|
||
# Action recommendation
|
||
action = self._determine_action(regime_prob, crisis_prob, confidence)
|
||
|
||
# Explanation
|
||
explanation = self._generate_explanation(regime_result, crisis_prob, action)
|
||
|
||
return {
|
||
'regime_classification': regime_result['regime'],
|
||
'regime_probability': regime_prob,
|
||
'crisis_probability': crisis_prob,
|
||
'combined_confidence': confidence,
|
||
'action_recommendation': action,
|
||
'explanation': explanation,
|
||
'timestamp': regime_result['timestamp']
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Nautilus Tick Processor:**
|
||
```python
|
||
class NautilusTickProcessor:
|
||
"""Process Nautilus tick data for micro-scale crisis features"""
|
||
|
||
def __init__(self, symbols, shared_memory, crisis_detector):
|
||
self.symbols = symbols
|
||
self.shared_memory = shared_memory
|
||
self.crisis_detector = crisis_detector
|
||
|
||
# Tick aggregation for micro-features
|
||
self.tick_aggregator = TickAggregator()
|
||
self.velocity_calculator = TradeVelocityCalculator()
|
||
self.momentum_calculator = TradeMomentumCalculator()
|
||
|
||
def on_trade_tick(self, tick):
|
||
"""Called for each Nautilus trade tick"""
|
||
|
||
# Calculate trade velocity (from your requirement)
|
||
velocity = self.velocity_calculator.update(tick)
|
||
self.shared_memory.tick_velocity.append(velocity)
|
||
|
||
# Calculate price momentum
|
||
momentum = self.momentum_calculator.update(tick.price)
|
||
self.shared_memory.tick_momentum.append(momentum)
|
||
|
||
# Topological analysis (every 100 ticks)
|
||
if len(self.shared_memory.tick_momentum) % 100 == 0:
|
||
topology_score = self._analyze_tick_topology()
|
||
|
||
# Cross-scale coherence (tick vs 15m patterns)
|
||
coherence_score = self._calculate_cross_scale_coherence()
|
||
|
||
# Update micro crisis features
|
||
micro_crisis_score = (topology_score + coherence_score) / 2
|
||
|
||
self.shared_memory.tick_features = {
|
||
'crisis_score': micro_crisis_score,
|
||
'velocity': velocity,
|
||
'momentum': momentum,
|
||
'topology': topology_score,
|
||
'coherence': coherence_score
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Enhanced DOLPHIN Main Loop:**
|
||
```python
|
||
async def enhanced_run_single_detection(self):
|
||
"""Modified DOLPHIN main loop with embedded crisis detection"""
|
||
|
||
# Existing DOLPHIN regime detection
|
||
regime_result = await self.run_original_regime_detection()
|
||
|
||
# NEW: Crisis detection using shared memory
|
||
combined_result = self.crisis_detector.update_from_regime_detection(regime_result)
|
||
|
||
# Output enhanced result
|
||
self.print_enhanced_results(combined_result)
|
||
|
||
# Save enhanced results
|
||
self.save_enhanced_results(combined_result)
|
||
|
||
return combined_result
|
||
|
||
def print_enhanced_results(self, result):
|
||
"""Enhanced output with regime + crisis information"""
|
||
print(f"\nENHANCED MARKET ANALYSIS:")
|
||
print(f"Regime: {result['regime_classification']} ({result['regime_probability']:.1%})")
|
||
print(f"Crisis: {result['crisis_probability']:.1%} risk")
|
||
print(f"Action: {result['action_recommendation']}")
|
||
print(f"Confidence: {result['combined_confidence']:.1%}")
|
||
print(f"Logic: {result['explanation'][0]}")
|
||
print(f" {result['explanation'][1]}")
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Key Implementation Features:**
|
||
|
||
1. **Shared Memory**: Direct memory sharing between regime and crisis detection
|
||
2. **Zero-Copy**: Correlation matrices shared by reference
|
||
3. **Nautilus Integration**: Direct tick processing within DOLPHIN
|
||
4. **Performance**: Crisis analysis only when sufficient data available
|
||
5. **Output Enhancement**: Preserves existing DOLPHIN output + adds crisis layer
|
||
|
||
**Next Steps:**
|
||
1. Modify existing DOLPHIN `main.py` to use `EnhancedMarketRegimeDetector`
|
||
2. Integrate with your Nautilus tick aggregation system
|
||
3. Add websocket output for JERICHO consumption
|
||
4. Test with historical data
|
||
|
||
Should I proceed with implementing the specific crisis detection algorithms within this embedded architecture?
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
Powered by [Claude Exporter](https://www.claudexporter.com) |