Architecture: hftbacktest replaces _fill_from_levels() + manual book updates Everything above transition() stays the same What changes: - HftBacktestCWM: new class implementing CodeWorldModel protocol - transition(): submit/cancel via hftbacktest, convert state back - fill model: ProbQueueModel (queue-position-aware) - latency: interpolated from historical data What does NOT change: - Planner (SM-MCTS, EXP3, Thompson, etc.) - Counterparty ecology (ToxicTaker, PassiveMaker, etc.) - Risk gate (all 6 checks) - CMA-ES trainer - PerformanceMatrix - Reward function (same PnL + adverse selection + risk) - Action menu, FulfilmentAction, ScenarioFactory - ALL existing tests Integration: 3 steps, zero core changes: 1. Create malkhut/cwm/hft_cwm.py 2. Swap cwm_factory in PolicyEvaluator 3. Done
16 KiB
hftbacktest CWM Integration Design
Goal: Use hftbacktest as the simulated exchange/OB engine underneath MALKHUT's CWM, while keeping the entire game-theoretic layer (planner, counterparty ecology, CMA-ES, risk gate, PerformanceMatrix) unchanged.
Principle: hftbacktest replaces _fill_from_levels() + manual book updates.
Everything above transition() stays the same.
Architecture: What Changes, What Doesn't
MALKHUT (unchanged)
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Planner (DecoupledUCBPlanner / EXP3 / Thompson / ...) │
│ CounterpartyEcology (ToxicTaker / PassiveMaker / ...) │
│ RiskGate (kill_switch / self_trade / leverage / ...) │
│ CMA-ES Trainer + PerformanceMatrix + StrategySelector │
│ FulfilmentAction (order_type × time_in_force × post_only) │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ calls transition(state, joint_action)
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CWM Protocol: transition() / reward() / terminal() │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ HftBacktestCWM (NEW — replaces MinimalCryptoLOBCWM) │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ transition() → hftbacktest submit/cancel + elapse │ │
│ │ reward() → MALKHUT reward function (unchanged) │ │
│ │ terminal() → unchanged │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└──────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ internally calls
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ hftbacktest HashMapMarketDepthBacktest │
│ (Rust-backed, event-driven LOB simulation) │
│ │
│ .submit_buy_order() ← our PLACE/CROSS_SPREAD │
│ .submit_sell_order() ← our PLACE/CROSS_SPREAD │
│ .cancel() ← our CANCEL │
│ .elapse(nanoseconds) ← time progression │
│ .depth() ← current book snapshot │
│ .position() ← our current position │
│ │
│ Features: │
│ - ProbQueueModel: probabilistic fill based on queue pos │
│ - Interpolated latency: exchange + local event ordering │
│ - Partial fills: order fills across multiple levels │
│ - Fee models: flat_per_trade or trading_value │
│ - Tick/lot: enforced by the engine │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The Bridge: HftBacktestCWM
class HftBacktestCWM:
"""CWM backed by hftbacktest's event-driven LOB engine.
Implements the same CodeWorldModel protocol as MinimalCryptoLOBCWM.
Drop-in replacement: same transition() / reward() / terminal() API.
"""
def __init__(
self,
symbol: str = "BTCUSDT",
tick_size: float = 0.1,
lot_size: float = 0.001,
maker_fee_bps: float = 2.0,
taker_fee_bps: float = 5.0,
latency_ns: int = 100_000_000, # 100ms order latency
data: Optional[np.ndarray] = None, # pre-loaded L2 event data
):
import hftbacktest as hbt
asset = (hbt.BacktestAsset()
.linear_asset(1.0) # linear (not inverse) perp
.tick_size(tick_size)
.lot_size(lot_size)
.flat_per_trade_fee_model(maker_fee_bps / 10_000,
taker_fee_bps / 10_000)
.constant_order_latency(latency_ns, latency_ns)
.power_prob_queue_model(3) # queue position model
.partial_fill_exchange()
)
if data is not None:
asset.add_data(data)
self.hbt = hbt.build_hashmap_backtest([asset])
self._symbol = symbol
self._tick_size = tick_size
self._lot_size = lot_size
self._order_id_seq = 0
self._pending_fills = [] # filled orders awaiting retrieval
def transition(
self,
state: MarketWorldState,
joint_action: JointAction,
) -> MarketWorldState:
our_action = joint_action[0]
counterparty_actions = joint_action[1:]
# 1. Process our action through hftbacktest
if isinstance(our_action, FulfilmentAction):
self._process_our_action(our_action, state)
# 2. Process counterparty actions through hftbacktest
for cp in counterparty_actions:
if isinstance(cp, CounterpartyAction):
self._process_counterparty(cp, state)
# 3. Elapse time (advance the engine by one tick)
self.hbt.elapse(1_000_000) # 1ms
# 4. Wait for order responses
self.hbt.wait_next_feed()
self.hbt.wait_order_response()
# 5. Convert hftbacktest state → MALKHUT MarketWorldState
return self._build_next_state(state, our_action)
def _process_our_action(self, action: FulfilmentAction, state: MarketWorldState):
"""Convert MALKHUT FulfilmentAction → hftbacktest order submission."""
import hftbacktest as hbt
if action.kind.value in ("PLACE", "CANCEL_REPLACE"):
price = materialize_price_from_action(state, action)
if price is None:
return
qty = action.qty_fraction * state.account.available_balance / max(price, 1e-12)
qty = _round_lot(qty, self._lot_size)
if qty <= 0:
return
self._order_id_seq += 1
if action.side == Side.BUY:
self.hbt.submit_buy_order(
self._order_id_seq, qty, price,
hbt.Trigger.GTC,
)
else:
self.hbt.submit_sell_order(
self._order_id_seq, qty, price,
hbt.Trigger.GTC,
)
elif action.kind.value == "CROSS_SPREAD":
# Aggressive fill: submit at best available
price = materialize_price_from_action(state, action)
if price is None:
return
qty = action.qty_fraction * state.account.available_balance / max(price, 1e-12)
qty = _round_lot(qty, self._lot_size)
if qty <= 0:
return
self._order_id_seq += 1
# Submit IOC-like (aggressive limit at market price)
if action.side == Side.BUY:
self.hbt.submit_buy_order(
self._order_id_seq, qty, state.book.best_ask,
hbt.Trigger.IOC,
)
else:
self.hbt.submit_sell_order(
self._order_id_seq, qty, state.book.best_bid,
hbt.Trigger.IOC,
)
elif action.kind.value == "CANCEL":
if action.cancel_order_id:
oid = self._parse_order_id(action.cancel_order_id)
self.hbt.cancel(oid)
def _process_counterparty(self, cp: CounterpartyAction, state: MarketWorldState):
"""Counterparty actions hit the hftbacktest book as external events."""
if cp.kind.value == "CROSS_SPREAD" and cp.side:
# Counterparty crosses spread → inject as external trade
qty = cp.qty_fraction_of_top * state.account.available_balance / max(
state.book.mid if state.book.bids and state.book.asks else 1.0, 1e-12)
price = state.book.best_ask if cp.side == Side.BUY else state.book.best_bid
# hftbacktest handles this via feed events (external trades)
# For simplicity, we submit as IOC from "other" side
self._order_id_seq += 1
if cp.side == Side.BUY:
self.hbt.submit_sell_order(
self._order_id_seq, qty, price, hbt.Trigger.IOC,
)
else:
self.hbt.submit_buy_order(
self._order_id_seq, qty, price, hbt.Trigger.IOC,
)
def _build_next_state(
self,
prev_state: MarketWorldState,
action: FulfilmentAction,
) -> MarketWorldState:
"""Convert hftbacktest engine state → MALKHUT MarketWorldState."""
# Get current position from hftbacktest
hbt_pos = self.hbt.position(0) # asset index 0
# Get current book depth
bid_depth = self.hbt.depth(0, is_ask=False) # bid levels
ask_depth = self.hbt.depth(0, is_ask=True) # ask levels
# Convert to MALKHUT OrderBookState
bids = tuple(
PriceLevel(float(level.px), float(level.qty))
for level in bid_depth[:20] # top 20 levels
if level.qty > 0
)
asks = tuple(
PriceLevel(float(level.px), float(level.qty))
for level in ask_depth[:20]
if level.qty > 0
)
book = OrderBookState(
ts_ns=prev_state.ts_ns + 1_000_000,
symbol=self._symbol,
bids=bids or (PriceLevel(0.0, 0.0),),
asks=asks or (PriceLevel(0.0, 0.0),),
)
# Convert position
pos_qty = float(hbt_pos.qty)
pos_avg = float(hbt_pos.avg_entry_price) if pos_qty != 0 else 0.0
# ... (equity, available_balance, path_state calculation same as current CWM)
return MarketWorldState(
ts_ns=prev_state.ts_ns + 1_000_000,
mode=prev_state.mode,
venue=prev_state.venue,
book=book,
account=new_account,
open_orders=(), # hftbacktest tracks internally
trade_path=new_trade_path,
intent=prev_state.intent,
)
def reward(self, prev_state, action, next_state, params):
"""Same reward function as current CWM — unchanged."""
return compute_reward_vectorized(...)
def terminal(self, state, depth):
"""Same terminal check — unchanged."""
return depth <= 0
Data Flow: How Actions Become Fills
Step 1: Planner calls plan(state, params) → PlannedPolicy
selected_action = FulfilmentAction(PLACE, BUY, LIMIT, offset=5, tif=IOC)
Step 2: CMA-ES calls transition(state, (our_action, cp1, cp2, cp3))
Step 3: HftBacktestCWM.transition():
a. submit_buy_order(id=42, qty=0.01, price=63999.5, IOC)
b. Counterparty ToxicTaker: submit_sell_order(id=43, qty=0.005, IOC)
c. hbt.elapse(1ms) → engine processes events
d. hbt.wait_order_response() → fills collected
e. _build_next_state() → MarketWorldState with updated book/position
Step 4: CMA-ES calls reward(prev, action, next, params)
→ Same reward function (unchanged)
Step 5: Repeat for next step
What We Get vs Current CWM
| Feature | Current CWM | hftbacktest CWM |
|---|---|---|
| Fill model | Deterministic level consumption | Probabilistic queue position (PowerProbQueue) |
| Queue position | Estimated (qty * 0.5) | Modeled from order arrival/cancel dynamics |
| Latency | Instant fill | Interpolated from historical (100ms exchange latency) |
| Partial fills | Yes (level-by-level) | Yes (queue-aware) |
| Market impact | Simple 0.5 * fraction | Implicit in book consumption + refill |
| Fee model | Manual calculation | Built-in (flat_per_trade) |
| Counterparty fills | External trade injection | Same (IOC orders from other side) |
| Reward function | MALKHUT custom | UNCHANGED — same PnL + adverse selection + risk |
| Path state | MALKHUT MAE/MFE | UNCHANGED |
| Risk gate | MALKHUT RiskGate | UNCHANGED |
| Planner | MALKHUT SM-MCTS | UNCHANGED |
Data Requirement
hftbacktest needs L2 depth data in its event array format:
# Event array dtype:
# (ev, exch_ts, local_ts, px, qty, order_id, ival, fval)
# ev: event type (1=depth, 2=trade, etc.)
# exch_ts: exchange timestamp (nanoseconds)
# local_ts: local receive timestamp (nanoseconds)
# px: price (float64)
# qty: quantity (float64)
data = hbt.Recorder.data("BTCUSDT", "2026-07-01")
Sources:
- Tardis.dev (tardis.dev) — historical L2 data for Binance, Bybit, etc.
- Binance data portal — free daily L2 snapshots
- Live recording — hftbacktest has
LiveInstrumentfor real-time capture
For our current use case (behavior-driven simulation), we can also SYNTHESIZE L2 data from our AssetBehavior profiles:
def synthesize_l2_data(behavior: AssetBehavior, duration_ns: int) -> np.ndarray:
"""Generate synthetic L2 events matching the asset's behavior profile."""
events = []
mid = behavior.reference_price
for t in range(0, duration_ns, 1_000_000): # 1ms steps
# Generate depth events from power-law profile
for d_bps in range(1, 100):
depth_usd = behavior.depth_at_bps(d_bps)
price = mid * (1 + d_bps / 10_000)
events.append(make_depth_event(t, price, depth_usd / mid))
# Generate trade events from flow profile
n_trades = int(behavior.flow.orders_per_sec_normal / 1000)
for _ in range(n_trades):
trade_price = mid * (1 + random.gauss(0, behavior.vol.annualized_normal / 100))
events.append(make_trade_event(t, trade_price, behavior.flow.avg_trade_usd / trade_price))
return np.array(events, dtype=EVENT_ARRAY)
Integration Steps (no code changes to MALKHUT core)
-
Create
malkhut/cwm/hft_cwm.py—HftBacktestCWMclass implementingCodeWorldModelprotocol (transition/reward/terminal). -
Wire
create_planner()to accept CWM class — already supports this:create_planner("sm_mcts", cwm=HftBacktestCWM(...), ...) -
Update
PolicyEvaluator.cwm_factory— swapMinimalCryptoLOBCWM()withHftBacktestCWM(symbol=..., data=...). -
No changes to: planner, counterparty ecology, CMA-ES, risk gate, PerformanceMatrix, ScenarioFactory, action menu, or any test.
Why This Is Safe
The CWM is a leaf dependency — nothing depends ON it except the evaluator
and the planner, both of which use it through the CodeWorldModel protocol.
Swapping the implementation behind that protocol is a textbook Strategy pattern.
The planner doesn't know or care whether the book is synthesized or hftbacktest.
The reward function is pure math on (prev_state, action, next_state) — identical
regardless of how next_state was computed.