DOCS: rename RECENT VIOLET 34E to hash-based name

prod/docs/RECENT_VIOLET_34E_2d37ef0.md

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+# RECENT VIOLET 34E — trade/slot-granularity comparison harness
+
+This pass implemented the next numbered comparison item from the main Violet spec:
+the trade/slot-granularity comparison that was still deferred after the V3.4c
+live-source work and shadow journal wiring.
+
+## What existed before
+
+Before this pass, Violet already had:
+
+- `VioletDecisionEngine` producing shadow decisions
+- `VioletDecisionJournal` persisting actuated decisions to `violet_decisions`
+- live-source adapters for BLUE-published factors
+- full sizing parity through `VioletSizer`
+
+What was still missing was a dedicated comparison unit that could collapse those
+journaled decisions into episode-sized runs and compare them against the terminal
+trade surface at the same granularity.
+
+## What was added
+
+I added a new Violet-only comparator:
+
+- [prod/clean_arch/violet/trade_slot_compare.py](/mnt/dolphinng5_predict/prod/clean_arch/violet/trade_slot_compare.py)
+- [prod/clean_arch/violet/test_violet_trade_slot_compare.py](/mnt/dolphinng5_predict/prod/clean_arch/violet/test_violet_trade_slot_compare.py)
+
+The new module provides:
+
+- `DecisionEpisode`: a collapsed run of contiguous shadow decisions for one
+  asset/side
+- `TradeEpisode`: a collapsed terminal trade record grouped by `trade_id`
+- `EpisodeMatch`: a paired decision/trade episode with timing and row-count gaps
+- `TradeSlotComparison`: the full comparison result
+- `compare_trade_slot_granularity(...)`: the top-level collapse-and-compare API
+
+## How it works
+
+The comparator is deliberately narrow:
+
+- it groups decision rows by `asset` + `side`
+- it splits them into episodes when the scan number gap exceeds the configured
+  `max_scan_gap`
+- it groups trade rows by `trade_id`
+- it ignores malformed rows rather than failing on them
+- it matches episodes by asset/side and preserves unmatched decision/trade rows
+
+This is downstream of the existing shadow journal. It does not reimplement ACB,
+EsoF, OB, or sizing math. It only compares the surfaces that already exist.
+
+## Anomaly handling
+
+The comparator rejects or skips bad inputs instead of letting them pollute the
+episode view:
+
+- missing asset or side
+- missing or invalid scan number
+- malformed or missing trade id
+- non-finite numeric fields
+
+That keeps the harness usable against noisy journal extracts and historical trade
+rows that may contain replay artifacts.
+
+## Tests
+
+The new tests cover:
+
+- episode collapse across contiguous decision rows
+- terminal trade dedupe through `trade_id`
+- scan-gap splitting
+- malformed row handling
+- empty-input behavior
+
+Verification on this pass:
+
+- `PYTHONPATH=/mnt/dolphinng5_predict rtk python -m pytest -q /mnt/dolphinng5_predict/prod/clean_arch/violet/test_violet_trade_slot_compare.py`
+- result: `3 passed`
+
+## Why this is the right next step
+
+The main Violet plan explicitly defers trade/slot-granularity comparison until the
+shadow side has a comparable execution surface. That condition is now met well
+enough to build the comparison harness without touching BLUE or the live executor.
+