VIOLET V3d: base-sizer parity harness + gate vs recorded BLUE

parity_harness.py: median-curve parity of V3a VioletBetSizer vs recorded
dolphin.trade_events (vel_div->leverage), restricted to short-signal domain.
GATE PASSES on prod host: pearson 0.9998, max_abs_err 0.238 (budget 1.0) over
23 bins -> base conviction sizer reproduces BLUE's central tendency. Per-trade
scatter is the deferred SC/ACB/OB/gold modulation layer (separate finding doc).
3 unit + 1 gate green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Codex
2026-06-13 20:26:08 +02:00
parent 1e331d80bc
commit 1a449074ae
4 changed files with 482 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
{
"n_samples": 2111,
"n_bins": 23,
"max_abs_err": 0.23778841851851729,
"pearson_r": 0.9998403353285148,
"max_abs_err_budget": 1.0,
"pearson_budget": 0.95,
"bins": [
{
"vd_bin": -0.35,
"n": 8,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.24,
"n": 8,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.23,
"n": 10,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.22,
"n": 9,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.21,
"n": 8,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.19,
"n": 9,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.18,
"n": 8,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.17,
"n": 8,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.16,
"n": 9,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.15,
"n": 16,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.14,
"n": 11,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.13,
"n": 19,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.12,
"n": 28,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.11,
"n": 17,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.1,
"n": 26,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.09,
"n": 34,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.08,
"n": 53,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.07,
"n": 71,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.06,
"n": 114,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.05,
"n": 162,
"recorded_median_leverage": 9.0,
"base_conviction": 9.0,
"abs_err": 0.0
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.04,
"n": 278,
"recorded_median_leverage": 2.7807301000000004,
"base_conviction": 3.0185185185185177,
"abs_err": 0.23778841851851729
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.03,
"n": 519,
"recorded_median_leverage": 0.8341213,
"base_conviction": 0.8148148148148147,
"abs_err": 0.019306485185185296
},
{
"vd_bin": -0.02,
"n": 396,
"recorded_median_leverage": 0.513395575,
"base_conviction": 0.5,
"abs_err": 0.013395574999999993
}
],
"passed": true
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
"""VIOLET V3d: base-sizer parity harness vs recorded live BLUE.
Validates that the V3a ``VioletBetSizer`` reproduces BLUE's BASE conviction curve,
measured against recorded ``dolphin.trade_events`` (vel_div_entry -> leverage).
Per-trade ``leverage`` is NOT base alone — it is ``base_sizer(vel_div) +- modulation``
(SC-haircut / ACB / OB-cascade / "gold"; see
prod/docs/VIOLET_FINDING__MODULATION_LAYER_VS_UNDERUTILIZATION.md). The modulation is a
DEFERRED organ. So the parity GATE here is the BASE / MEDIAN curve: per vel_div bin, the
recorded MEDIAN leverage must track the base sizer's conviction at the bin midpoint —
proving L1 reproduces BLUE's central tendency. Per-trade exact parity is expected to be
low (~1/3) by construction and is NOT the gate.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import math
from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Tuple
from pydantic import Field
from .alpha_wrappers import VioletBetSizer
from .domain import StrictModel
class BinParity(StrictModel):
vd_bin: float
n: int = Field(ge=1)
recorded_median_leverage: float = Field(ge=0.0, allow_inf_nan=False)
base_conviction: float = Field(ge=0.0, allow_inf_nan=False)
abs_err: float = Field(ge=0.0, allow_inf_nan=False)
class ParityReport(StrictModel):
n_samples: int = Field(ge=0)
n_bins: int = Field(ge=0)
max_abs_err: float = Field(ge=0.0, allow_inf_nan=False)
pearson_r: float = Field(allow_inf_nan=False)
max_abs_err_budget: float
pearson_budget: float
bins: List[BinParity]
passed: bool
def _median(xs: List[float]) -> float:
s = sorted(xs)
k = len(s)
if k == 0:
return 0.0
mid = k // 2
return s[mid] if k % 2 else 0.5 * (s[mid - 1] + s[mid])
def _pearson(xs: List[float], ys: List[float]) -> float:
n = len(xs)
if n < 2:
return 1.0
mx, my = sum(xs) / n, sum(ys) / n
sxy = sum((x - mx) * (y - my) for x, y in zip(xs, ys))
sxx = sum((x - mx) ** 2 for x in xs)
syy = sum((y - my) ** 2 for y in ys)
if sxx <= 0 or syy <= 0:
return 1.0
return sxy / math.sqrt(sxx * syy)
def base_curve_parity(
samples: List[Tuple[float, float]], # (vel_div, recorded_leverage)
sizer: VioletBetSizer,
*,
bin_width: float = 0.01,
min_n: int = 8,
vel_div_threshold: float = -0.02,
max_abs_err_budget: float = 1.0,
pearson_budget: float = 0.95,
) -> ParityReport:
"""Bin by vel_div; compare recorded MEDIAN leverage to the base sizer's
conviction at the bin midpoint. Gate: max bin abs-err <= budget AND
recorded-vs-base Pearson r >= budget across bins.
Restricted to the SHORT-signal domain (vd <= vel_div_threshold): outside it
the base short sizer floors at min_leverage and the recorded trades are
long-side / edge cases the short base curve does not govern.
"""
buckets: Dict[float, List[float]] = {}
for vd, lev in samples:
if vd > vel_div_threshold:
continue
b = round(round(vd / bin_width) * bin_width, 4)
buckets.setdefault(b, []).append(float(lev))
bins: List[BinParity] = []
rec_meds: List[float] = []
base_vals: List[float] = []
for b in sorted(buckets):
levs = buckets[b]
if len(levs) < min_n:
continue
rec_med = _median(levs)
base = sizer.calculate(capital=1.0, vel_div=b, trade_direction=-1).conviction_leverage
bins.append(BinParity(
vd_bin=b, n=len(levs), recorded_median_leverage=rec_med,
base_conviction=base, abs_err=abs(rec_med - base),
))
rec_meds.append(rec_med)
base_vals.append(base)
max_abs_err = max((bp.abs_err for bp in bins), default=0.0)
r = _pearson(base_vals, rec_meds)
passed = bool(bins) and max_abs_err <= max_abs_err_budget and r >= pearson_budget
return ParityReport(
n_samples=len(samples), n_bins=len(bins),
max_abs_err=max_abs_err, pearson_r=r,
max_abs_err_budget=max_abs_err_budget, pearson_budget=pearson_budget,
bins=bins, passed=passed,
)
def load_recorded_samples_from_ch(
*, limit: int = 5000, ch_url: str = "http://localhost:8123/",
user: str = "dolphin", key: str = "dolphin_ch_2026",
) -> List[Tuple[float, float]]:
"""Pull clean (vel_div_entry, leverage) pairs from recorded BLUE trades."""
import urllib.request
sql = (
"WITH dedup AS (SELECT trade_id, any(vel_div_entry) vd, any(leverage) lev, "
"any(exit_reason) er, any(bars_held) bh FROM dolphin.trade_events GROUP BY trade_id) "
"SELECT vd, lev FROM dedup WHERE er!='HIBERNATE_HALT' AND bh>0 AND lev>0 "
f"LIMIT {int(limit)} FORMAT TSV"
)
req = urllib.request.Request(
ch_url, data=sql.encode(),
headers={"X-ClickHouse-User": user, "X-ClickHouse-Key": key},
)
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=30) as resp:
body = resp.read().decode()
out: List[Tuple[float, float]] = []
for line in body.splitlines():
if not line.strip():
continue
a, b = line.split("\t")
out.append((float(a), float(b)))
return out
def live_blue_sizer() -> VioletBetSizer:
"""The sizer parameterized to live BLUE's BASE curve (pinned 2026-06-13 from the
recorded median curve: max_leverage 9.0, thr -0.02, extreme -0.05, convexity 3)."""
return VioletBetSizer(
base_fraction=0.20, min_leverage=0.5, max_leverage=9.0,
vel_div_threshold=-0.02, vel_div_extreme=-0.05, leverage_convexity=3.0,
)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
"""V3d: base-sizer median-curve parity vs recorded BLUE (unit + @gate)."""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import sys
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
sys.path.insert(0, "/mnt/dolphinng5_predict")
import pytest
from prod.clean_arch.violet.parity_harness import (
ParityReport, base_curve_parity, live_blue_sizer, load_recorded_samples_from_ch,
)
REPORTS_DIR = Path("/mnt/dolphinng5_predict/prod/VIOLET_dev/reports")
def _base_samples(per_bin: int = 12):
"""Synthetic samples drawn exactly from the base curve (perfect parity)."""
s = live_blue_sizer()
out = []
for k in range(2, 13): # vd = -0.02 .. -0.12, all on 0.01 bin centers
vd = -k / 100.0
base = s.calculate(capital=1.0, vel_div=vd, trade_direction=-1).conviction_leverage
out.extend([(vd, base)] * per_bin)
return out
def test_perfect_base_samples_pass():
rep = base_curve_parity(_base_samples(), live_blue_sizer())
assert rep.passed
assert rep.max_abs_err == pytest.approx(0.0, abs=1e-6)
assert rep.pearson_r == pytest.approx(1.0, abs=1e-6)
def test_median_tracks_base_under_minority_haircuts():
# majority at base, minority haircut down -> median still tracks base -> passes.
s = live_blue_sizer()
samples = []
for k in range(2, 13): # vd on 0.01 bin centers
vd = -k / 100.0
base = s.calculate(capital=1.0, vel_div=vd, trade_direction=-1).conviction_leverage
samples.extend([(vd, base)] * 8) # 8 at base
samples.extend([(vd, base * 0.3)] * 3) # 3 haircut (minority)
rep = base_curve_parity(samples, s)
assert rep.passed
def test_decorrelated_noise_fails_gate():
# leverage independent of vel_div -> low correlation -> gate fails (guard works).
import random
rng = random.Random(7)
samples = [(vd / 1000.0, rng.uniform(0.5, 9.0))
for vd in range(-60, -1) for _ in range(12)]
rep = base_curve_parity(samples, live_blue_sizer())
assert not rep.passed
@pytest.mark.gate
def test_base_curve_parity_vs_recorded_blue():
"""GATE (prod host): the V3a base sizer reproduces BLUE's recorded median curve."""
samples = load_recorded_samples_from_ch(limit=5000)
assert len(samples) >= 500, f"too few recorded samples: {len(samples)}"
rep = base_curve_parity(samples, live_blue_sizer())
REPORTS_DIR.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
ts = datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M%S")
(REPORTS_DIR / f"violet_v3_parity_{ts}.json").write_text(
json.dumps(rep.model_dump(), indent=2, default=str))
assert isinstance(rep, ParityReport)
assert rep.n_bins >= 5
assert rep.passed, (
f"base-curve parity FAILED: max_abs_err={rep.max_abs_err:.3f} "
f"(budget {rep.max_abs_err_budget}), pearson={rep.pearson_r:.3f} "
f"(budget {rep.pearson_budget})"
)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
# VIOLET Finding — The Sizing-Modulation Layer vs. the Capital-Under-Utilization Result
**Status:** Finding / caveat, 2026-06-13. Separate doc by operator request. Qualifies
(does NOT overturn) the [[blue_margin_envelope_study]] and constrains the
`VIOLET_STUDY_SPEC__BASE_FRACTION_SIZING.md` (#3) and any pre-V4 sizing work.
## TL;DR
The newly-isolated downstream **sizing-modulation layer** (SC-haircut / ACB / OB-cascade
/ "gold" — the organs that ride along ACBv6) does **not** counter the margin study: that
study used **actual recorded notionals**, which are already post-modulation. But it
**sharpens** what "under-utilized capital" means, and makes the modulation layer a
**required** pre-execution component for VIOLET — not optional.
## 1. Why the margin study is NOT contradicted
The margin/viability study computed `our_leverage = entry_price·quantity / capital_before`
from `dolphin.trade_events` — i.e. from the **notionals BLUE actually traded**, haircuts
and boosts already baked in. The modulation is therefore *inside* the measured numbers,
not a missed factor. Conclusions stand on the as-traded data:
- max realized `our_leverage`**1.81**
- **100%** of trades margin-feasible at **2×** exchange leverage
- **+$47k** clean deduped edge
## 2. How recorded leverage decomposes (the discovery)
Recorded conviction `leverage` is **NOT** the base bet-sizer output alone:
```
recorded_leverage(trade) = base_sizer(vel_div) ± modulation(SC, ACB, OB, gold)
```
- **base_sizer(vel_div)** — cubic-convex strength³ curve; VIOLET's V3a `VioletBetSizer`
reproduces it (validated on binned MEDIANS: vd 0.03→0.83, 0.04→2.78, 0.05→9.0 with
max_leverage=9 / thr 0.02 / extreme 0.05 / convexity 3).
- **modulation** — mostly **downward haircuts** (mins far below the median per vel_div
bin), with some upward boosts to the 9 cap. This is the per-trade scatter that drops
exact per-trade parity to ~34% while the median curve matches.
## 3. The sharpening (this is the load-bearing part)
The study's **median wallet utilization was ~6.8%** (`our_leverage` p50 ≈ 0.068). That
low median is **largely the haircut layer at work** — BLUE deliberately sized most trades
far below the base curve. The **max 1.81** is the *un-haircut, base-saturated* tail.
Consequences:
1. **Margin feasibility is robust** even if the haircuts are later dropped: the study's
worst case (1.81) already equals the base-saturated value, and 2× covers it. Sizing at
full base does not break margin.
2. **"Under-utilized ⇒ free ROI" is now GUARDED.** Much of the idle ~93% is **not waste**
— it is the modulation layer **deliberately de-risking** (cutting size on
lower-conviction / higher-risk setups). It is risk knowledge encoded as size.
## 4. Binding implications
- **#3 base-fraction study MUST NOT read the 6.8% median as free headroom.** A large part
of it is risk-management. Any base-fraction increase must be evaluated *with* the
modulation layer modeled, conditioned on the regime-robustness work — never by naively
reclaiming the idle capital.
- **The modulation layer is REQUIRED before live execution (V4).** VIOLET running the
**base sizer alone** would size *bigger than BLUE did* on exactly the trades BLUE chose
to haircut → utilization jumps from ~7% median toward the base, and **realized
risk/return diverges from the recorded +$47k** (more variance, possibly worse
risk-adjusted). Median-curve base parity (V3d) is necessary but **not sufficient** for
faithful BLUE replication.
- **New deferred task (pre-V4):** wrap the SC-haircut / ACB / OB-cascade / "gold"
modulation organs as a VIOLET sizing-modulation layer on top of the base
`VioletBetSizer`, with its own per-trade parity gate vs recorded `leverage`.
## 5. Related
[[blue_margin_envelope_study]] · [[violet_v3_alpha_doctrine]] (#9 keystone, #11 parity
finding) · `VIOLET_STUDY_SPEC__BASE_FRACTION_SIZING.md` · `prod/clean_arch/violet/alpha_wrappers.py`
(base sizer) · live organs in `prod/nautilus_event_trader.py`
(`_apply_sc_entry_size_multiplier`, `_record_sc_haircut`, `AdaptiveCircuitBreaker`).