malkhut(docs + bench): comprehensive update + smoke test script
README updated with: - Vectorized UCB selection (7.7x speedup, 1.13µs/selection) - Batch MCTS kernel (numba-accelerated) - Fast scalar + advantage scoring modes - Updated performance benchmarks (1186 tests, 390 scenarios, 3043 score/min) - Advantage scorer module in package structure smoke_1h.py: standalone training script for extended runs. Total session: 19 commits, 1186 tests, all green. All implementations: parallel eval (7x), vectorized reward (numba), vectorized UCB (7.7x), fast scalar scoring, advantage mode, DuckDB store (sub-µs reads), asset compiler, behavior DSL, multi-exchange support, three-layer identifiers.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ MALKHUT/
|
||||
│ │ ├── parallel_eval.py # ProcessPoolExecutor episode runner
|
||||
│ │ ├── ray_eval.py # Ray-based eval (industrial alternative)
|
||||
│ │ ├── vbt_analysis.py # Post-sim metrics: Sharpe, Sortino, VaR
|
||||
│ │ ├── advantage_scorer.py # Advantage estimation for offline analysis
|
||||
│ │ ├── cognition.py # Rate-limited market regime research
|
||||
│ │ ├── regime_expansion.py # 200+ regimes from dimension combinations
|
||||
│ │ ├── news_sources.py # 12 industry-standard news sources
|
||||
@@ -402,14 +403,14 @@ simple doctrinal tick-exits (C11) ship first via T19 step 3; MALKHUT supersedes
|
||||
|
||||
## DEVELOPMENT STATUS (2026-07-13)
|
||||
|
||||
**1178 test functions. 50 test files. All green. 0 failures. 0 regressions.**
|
||||
**1186 test functions. 50 test files. All green. 0 failures. 0 regressions.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Completed subsystems
|
||||
|
||||
| Subsystem | Module | Tests | Status |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **State Model** | `state.py` | 17 | 42 frozen dataclasses, immutable |
|
||||
| **CWM** | `cwm/core.py` + `cwm/numba_core.py` | 103 | Exchange mechanics + numba JIT (5.3µs/transition) + vectorized reward |
|
||||
| **CWM** | `cwm/core.py` + `cwm/numba_core.py` | 103 | Exchange mechanics + numba JIT (5.3µs/transition) + vectorized reward + vectorized UCB + batch MCTS kernel |
|
||||
| **Replay Verification** | `cwm/replay_verify.py` | 65 | Deep comparison, binary search, trajectory recording |
|
||||
| **Planner** | `planner/sm_mcts.py` | 11 | Decoupled UCB/UCT, ≤25ms budget |
|
||||
| **Action Menu** | `planner/action_menu.py` | (in planner) | Compact action space construction |
|
||||
@@ -424,6 +425,7 @@ simple doctrinal tick-exits (C11) ship first via T19 step 3; MALKHUT supersedes
|
||||
| **CMA-ES Training** | `training/cma_trainer.py` | 65 | Behavior-driven, auto-compile, parallel workers, 7x speedup |
|
||||
| **Parallel Eval** | `training/parallel_eval.py` | 16 | ProcessPoolExecutor, 7x CMA-ES speedup |
|
||||
| **Ray Eval** | `training/ray_eval.py` | 5 | Ray-based eval (available, slower for ≤1K scenarios) |
|
||||
| **Scoring Modes** | `cma_trainer.py` + `advantage_scorer.py` | 8 | Fast scalar (CMA loop) + advantage (offline analysis) |
|
||||
| **VBT Analysis** | `training/vbt_analysis.py` | 8 | Post-sim trade metrics: Sharpe, Sortino, VaR, cross-asset |
|
||||
| **Policy Registry** | `training/registry.py` | 14 | CANDIDATE → ACTIVE lifecycle |
|
||||
| **Training Pipeline** | `training/pipeline.py` | 21 | Bounded continuous learning loop |
|
||||
@@ -451,17 +453,18 @@ simple doctrinal tick-exits (C11) ship first via T19 step 3; MALKHUT supersedes
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Value |
|
||||
|--------|-------|
|
||||
| CWM transition | 5.3 µs/call (numba JIT) |
|
||||
| CWM throughput | 189K calls/sec |
|
||||
| CWM 100-step episode | 0.64 ms |
|
||||
| CWM reward (numba vectorized) | ~0.3µs (was 2µs with dict) |
|
||||
| CWM throughput | 189K calls/sec (numba JIT) |
|
||||
| CWM per-call latency | 5.3 µs |
|
||||
| CWM reward (numba vectorized) | ~0.3µs |
|
||||
| UCB selection (numba vectorized) | 1.13µs (was 8.7µs, 7.7x speedup) |
|
||||
| Numba fill speedup | 1.8x (batch 100) |
|
||||
| DuckDB asset reads | 0.2µs (in-memory) |
|
||||
| Scenario generation | 390 scenarios in 0.8s |
|
||||
| CMA-ES parallel (8 workers) | 7× speedup, 87% efficiency |
|
||||
| Best CMA-ES score (48 evals) | 2,594 (parallel) vs 1,727 (sequential) |
|
||||
| Score/min (8 workers) | 1,718 (was 164 sequential) |
|
||||
| Peak RAM | 146 MB |
|
||||
| Best CMA-ES score (48 evals) | 8,628 (fast scalar, 100.4 bps PnL) |
|
||||
| Score/min (8 workers) | 3,043 |
|
||||
| Episode throughput (parallel) | 16ms/ep |
|
||||
| Episode throughput (sequential) | 23ms/ep |
|
||||
|
||||
### Bugs found and fixed (22 total)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
97
MALKHUT/smoke_1h.py
Normal file
97
MALKHUT/smoke_1h.py
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
"""MALKHUT 1h+ Training Smoke — standalone script for background execution."""
|
||||
import time, os, sys, json
|
||||
|
||||
LOG = "/mnt/dolphinng5_predict/MALKHUT/smoke_1h_run.log"
|
||||
BUDGET = 192
|
||||
WORKERS = min(os.cpu_count() or 4, 8)
|
||||
|
||||
with open(LOG, "w") as f:
|
||||
f.write(f"MALKHUT 1H+ TRAINING SMOKE\n")
|
||||
f.write(f"Start: {time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')}\n")
|
||||
f.write(f"Config: budget={BUDGET} workers={WORKERS} pop=12\n")
|
||||
f.write(f"Assets: BTC/ETH/SOL (3 × 30 scenarios = 90)\n\n")
|
||||
f.flush()
|
||||
|
||||
print(f"Starting 1h+ smoke: budget={BUDGET} workers={WORKERS}", flush=True)
|
||||
|
||||
from malkhut.training.cma_trainer import (
|
||||
ScenarioFactory, PolicyEvaluator, CMAESTrainer, CMAParameterCodec, SelfPlayPool
|
||||
)
|
||||
from malkhut.cwm.core import MinimalCryptoLOBCWM
|
||||
from malkhut.state import FulfilmentPolicyParams
|
||||
import cma as cma_lib
|
||||
|
||||
factory = ScenarioFactory()
|
||||
suite = factory.build_suite(symbols=('BTCUSDT', 'ETHUSDT', 'SOLUSDT'), steps_per_scenario=5)
|
||||
evaluator = PolicyEvaluator(cwm_factory=MinimalCryptoLOBCWM)
|
||||
codec = CMAParameterCodec()
|
||||
pool = SelfPlayPool()
|
||||
|
||||
params = FulfilmentPolicyParams(
|
||||
version='baseline', ucb_c=1.414, max_sims=16, max_depth=2,
|
||||
rollout_depth=2, root_temperature=0.5, min_root_entropy=0.25,
|
||||
quote_offsets_ticks=(0, 1), quote_size_fractions=(0.25, 0.50),
|
||||
passive_ttl_ms=200, aggressive_ttl_ms=50,
|
||||
maker_edge_min_bps=0.5, cross_spread_edge_min_bps=5.0,
|
||||
adverse_toxicity_cancel_threshold=0.5, queue_churn_cancel_threshold=0.5,
|
||||
mae_tail_cut_bps=50.0, mfe_giveback_cut_fraction=0.5,
|
||||
max_time_in_loss_s=300.0, failed_recovery_cut_count=3,
|
||||
recovery_velocity_min_bps_per_s=0.0,
|
||||
max_symbol_notional_fraction=0.20, max_single_order_notional_fraction=0.05,
|
||||
reduce_when_global_up_fraction=0.30, session_profit_lock_fraction=0.02,
|
||||
w_expected_pnl=1.0, w_fill_probability=0.5, w_adverse_selection=2.0,
|
||||
w_queue_priority=0.5, w_inventory_risk=1.5, w_tail_loss=5.0,
|
||||
w_fee_quality=0.5, w_time_decay=0.3, w_policy_entropy=0.5,
|
||||
robust_tail_weight=2.0, toxic_counterparty_weight=3.0,
|
||||
low_liquidity_weight=2.0, latency_stress_weight=1.0,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
x0 = codec.initial_vector(params)
|
||||
lows, highs = codec.bounds()
|
||||
es = cma_lib.CMAEvolutionStrategy(x0, sigma0=0.30,
|
||||
inopts={"bounds": [lows, highs], "popsize": 12, "seed": 42, "verbose": -9})
|
||||
|
||||
eval_count, gen_best, gen_pnl = 0, [], []
|
||||
t0 = time.time()
|
||||
next_log = 120
|
||||
|
||||
with open(LOG, "a") as f:
|
||||
while not es.stop() and eval_count < BUDGET:
|
||||
xs = es.ask()
|
||||
losses, gs, gp = [], [], []
|
||||
for x in xs:
|
||||
if eval_count >= BUDGET:
|
||||
break
|
||||
cand = codec.decode(x, version=f"e{eval_count}")
|
||||
score, results = evaluator.evaluate_candidate(
|
||||
params=cand, scenarios=suite, rng_seed=eval_count,
|
||||
planner_type='sm_mcts', workers=WORKERS)
|
||||
pnl = sum(r.pnl_bps for r in results) / max(len(results), 1)
|
||||
losses.append(-score); gs.append(score); gp.append(pnl)
|
||||
eval_count += 1
|
||||
if gs:
|
||||
es.tell(xs[:len(losses)], losses)
|
||||
gen_best.append(max(gs))
|
||||
gen_pnl.append(sum(gp)/len(gp))
|
||||
elapsed = time.time() - t0
|
||||
if elapsed >= next_log:
|
||||
msg = (f"[{elapsed:.0f}s] Gen {len(gen_best)} | "
|
||||
f"{eval_count}/{BUDGET} evals | best={max(gen_best):,.0f} | "
|
||||
f"pnl={gen_pnl[-1]:.1f}bps | {eval_count/elapsed:.2f}e/s")
|
||||
f.write(msg + "\n"); f.flush()
|
||||
print(msg, flush=True)
|
||||
next_log += 120
|
||||
|
||||
total = time.time() - t0
|
||||
summary = (f"\n{'='*60}\nCOMPLETE\n"
|
||||
f" Duration: {total:.0f}s ({total/60:.1f}min)\n"
|
||||
f" Evals: {eval_count}/{BUDGET}\n"
|
||||
f" Rate: {eval_count/total:.2f} eval/s\n"
|
||||
f" Best score: {max(gen_best):,.0f} (gen {gen_best.index(max(gen_best))+1}/{len(gen_best)})\n"
|
||||
f" Final gen PnL: {gen_pnl[-1]:.1f}bps\n"
|
||||
f" Score curve (last 8): {gen_best[-8:]}\n"
|
||||
f" PnL curve (last 8): {[f'{p:.0f}' for p in gen_pnl[-8:]]}\n"
|
||||
f"{'='*60}\n")
|
||||
f.write(summary); f.flush()
|
||||
print(summary, flush=True)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user