malkhut(wire): venue passed through matrix recording for cross-exchange comparison
- evaluator: passes scenario.venue to matrix.record(venue=...) - PerformanceMatrix.record(): accepts venue parameter (default='bingx') - Enables cross-exchange learnings: same strategy tested on BingX vs Binance gets separate performance entries per venue Adversary ecology analysis: Counterparties operate at ActionKind level (CROSS_SPREAD/PLACE/CANCEL), not at order-type level. The CWM infers order type from ActionKind: CROSS_SPREAD → fills aggressively → equivalent to MARKET PLACE → passive quote → equivalent to LIMIT This is correct and venue-independent. Fee calculation already uses VenueRules (per-exchange fees). No adversary changes needed.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -188,8 +188,9 @@ class PerformanceMatrix:
|
||||
pnl_bps: float = 0.0,
|
||||
drawdown_bps: float = 0.0,
|
||||
adverse_fill_ratio: float = 0.0,
|
||||
venue: str = "bingx",
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""Record a strategy's performance in a regime."""
|
||||
"""Record a strategy's performance in a regime (optionally venue-tagged)."""
|
||||
key = (regime, strategy_id)
|
||||
existing = self._scores.get(key)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user